Can Individuals Delegate a Right They Don’t Have to the Government? -Video

Amazon.com – Read eBooks using the FREE Kindle Reading App


Jan: Can you properly delegate a right you do not have?

Sen. Inoue: You cannot tax your neighbor, but you can authorize me as a senator to vote for programs that will tax your neighbor…

Jan: Then you think that you can actually delegate a right you do not have? …It is interesting to me how the agent can have more power than the principle. If the principles are the people, and the source [of power] comes from the people, the individuals do not have the right to initiate force against others-

Sen. Inoue: As individuals-

Jan: Well, if they get together then all of the sudden they have the right?

Sen. Inoue: If they authorize the government to do so, yes. If they authorize the government to enter into a war and kill people, that’s a right.

Jan: Where does this right come from if it doesn’t come from the people?

Sen. Inoue: The people through the Constitution.

Jan: The Constitution was made by the people right? So then the people are the source of all legitimate power, so if the people did not have the right to initiate physical force against anybody, then the government cannot have- It seems like there’s a contradiction there as far as if you say that all legitimate governmental power is derived from the people, and you agree that the individual citizens do not have the right to initiate force against other citizens, then it would seem clear that they cannot delegate that right to the government.

Sen. Inoue: Why don’t we just leave it this way, we disagree.

What Jan Helfeld is saying is that if a citizen does not have the right to do something as an individual (like rob their neighbor), then what gives the government the right to rob his neighbor on the citizen’s behalf? If the government derives its power from the people, where does this extra power come from, that the people can never exercise as individuals?

What is so magic about government, that suddenly they can act on an individual’s behalf in a way that the individual could never act on his own? What is so magic about a group of individuals that allows them to rob their neighbor, or initiate force, when said force would always be illegitimate as an individual?

There’s nothing magic about it. It is wrong to initiate force as an individual, and it is also wrong to initiate force as a group, even with approval of the majority. The only legitimate way to take someone’s money (time, labor, wealth) is for them to voluntarily hand it over to you. Otherwise it is theft, even if the government is the robber.

Charity versus taxation is the difference between sex and rape.


7 thoughts on “Can Individuals Delegate a Right They Don’t Have to the Government? -Video

  1. An individual is not to be confused for a man or woman. A man or woman who has absconded that capacity, and accepted and assumed the identity of the person issued on the birth certificate, is without the authority to demand production of the logistics of the magic spells.

  2. Pingback: Government: Mind Control & The Illusion Of Authority

  3. Pingback: Government: Mind Control & The Illusion Of Authority | Philosophers Stone

  4. Pingback: Government: Mind Control & The Illusion Of Authority | Alternative News Network

  5. Pingback: Government: Mind Control and the Illusion of Authority – Illuminatus

  6. I consider myself a reasonably intelligent person, and until a couple years ago, I had never even bothered to consider where government derives its power.

    It is clear that if you don’t have the right to do something, you cannot delegate it. The senator’s response told me all I needed to know. Even he couldn’t rationalize it intellectually, so he just took the old “that’s the way it is” point if view. I don’t really care of people have views contrary to mine, but I do when they use those views to try to control me and everyone else on the planet. Very disturbing.

    • Exactly. They don’t say, “agree to disagree,” and part ways. They force their will on you. He doesn’t just leave it at disagreement, he uses threats of violence to enforce his power, clearly not derived from the people who can do no such thing. thanks for commenting!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s