Tax Foundation: America one of the Most Stifling Countries, Hurts Economy

This is why we can’t have nice things:

-because the government takes them. The U.S.A. has practically the worst tax system in the industrialized world. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Tax Foundation has ranked the U.S.A. 32 out of 34 countries in terms of “competitiveness and neutrality” in tax laws. In fact of the two countries worse than the United States in their taxing policies, one of them, France, has an actual Socialist as President.

A competitive tax code is one that limits the taxation of businesses and investment. Since capital is mobile and businesses can choose where to invest, tax rates that are too high “drive investment elsewhere, leading to slower economic growth,” as the Tax Foundation puts it.

By neutrality the foundation means “a tax code that seeks to raise the most revenue with the fewest economic distortions. This means that it doesn’t favor consumption over saving, as happens with capital gains and dividends taxes, estate taxes, and high progressive income taxes. This also means no targeted tax breaks for businesses for specific business activities.” Crony capitalism that rewards the likes of green energy with lower tax bills while imposing higher bills on other firms is political arbitrage that misallocates capital and reduces economic growth.

But What about Sweden, Finland, and Norway with their Safety Nets and Universal Healthcare?

All those countries liberals talk about as being way better than the U.S. in terms of what “the government provides” for the citizens; yea they have better tax systems. You see, in those countries their tax systems do not seek to “punish the rich”, so they can collect more tax revenue, without discouraging business. This in no way negates other arguments about why it is bad to have centralized and socialized government programs, but it does however show that America is essentially immature in their taxing policies.

America has an almost 40% corporate tax rate, and a progressive income tax. This means people who earn more money pay not only a higher amount of money, but a higher percentage of their income to the government. It should be obvious why this limits growth, and gives incentive to move money to better tax regions outside of the United states. The poster children of socialized nations however—Sweden, Norway, Finland–do no “punish the rich”. They are far less likely to tax an estate when a person has died, or capital gains: money made from investment.

Keeping estate taxes at bay means people save more money, knowing they will be able to pass it on, leading to more capital for banks to give out housing loans for instance. And taxing investment income less means people are more likely to invest, since the reward is greater. That type of tax code therefore rewards saving, fiscal responsibility, and economic investment, while deterring frivolous spending through consumption taxes, like a higher sales tax. The rich still pay more if they spend more, but not just for simply earning the money.

nicethings

Newsflash: The U.S. is Corrupt

I know, we like to think of the U.S. as pretty good when it comes to governing. But the United States government uses its tax code to punish their “enemies” and reward their “friends”. This is crony capitalism: different companies and individuals play by different rules depending on who they know. Capital generally flows to the most successful prospective investment, but the government can change that by making one investment more risky, due to a higher tax burden. In turn, capital flows to companies who will not be as successful in general because they were chosen based on the tax breaks the government gives them, versus the quality of the product or service.

So here’s the recipe for a successful crony capitalist economy, where the government gets to pick the winners and the losers. 1) Set the corporate tax rate the highest in the world:

The accounting firm KPMG maintains a corporate tax table that includes more than 130 countries and only one has a higher overall corporate tax rate than the U.S. The United Arab Emirates’ 55% rate is an exception, however, because it usually applies only to foreign oil companies.

Check. 2) Now retain the ability to arbitrarily lower said tax rate on an individual basis, so that companies you favor have an economic advantage over companies who play by the rules you set. And there you have an economic dictatorship, or “Fascist” State. (Working definition of Fascism: Complete economic control by the government of a country; the system of government characterized by total control over the means of production, versus ownership of the means of production, as in Socialism).

But we could also take it one step forward and implement oppression over the proletariat using our high corporate taxes. You see, there is a misconception that somehow taxing businesses at a higher rate will be better for workers. This is absurd; if companies pay higher taxes this leaves less money for paying employees. While some of the difference is made up through higher prices for the consumer, workers’ pay also takes a hit.

Abundant economic research, by Kevin Hassett and Aparna Mathur among others, has shown that higher corporate taxes lead to lower wages.

Lower wages mean people must work longer hours, giving them less free time, and therefore a lower quality of life. But the cycle does not end there. Less free time means more dependence on government institutions to tell us which products are safe through the FDA, USDA, EPA, CFPB, etcetera, thus giving even more control to the government to pick the economic winners and losers. Diminished free time also means fewer people have the time to pay attention to politics, and must rely again on government controlled media to tell them who to vote for.

These are not the only factors, but some key economic methods used by government to control a population. Therefore based on the evidence, it would seem countries like Sweden, Norway, and Finland care less about controlling their population than the U.S., despite having arguably more socialist tendencies.

7 thoughts on “Tax Foundation: America one of the Most Stifling Countries, Hurts Economy

    • Thank you! Yes it is pretty crazy, people need to know the truth about how bad our government’s policy is for economic growth. Unfortunately many still simply blame “the rich”.

  1. To many law makers that never remove old useless laws. Laws they make are to complex for anyone without a degree. Ex- excise tax is illegal can not charge a usage fee. Maridge license to get married , (tax) separation of church and government- most get married in a church.

  2. So true! Taxes are a great way to keep the common folk fearful and in line. The central government of the USA has no interest in true socialism anyway (thank god) The followers on the left think that is the goal but far from it. This government uses the same tactics as communist governments (recent usage) that create class warfare and an elite class consisting of insiders from the government and big business that runs everything for the rest of the population while excluding themselves from the rules and regulations that hold the rest down. The state capitalist society they have created over the years is in place to give the illusion that they are for the working class and the free market. It’s amazing to me how many people don’t see through the charade and that it’s all just a power grab by a select few who will “help” the poor, helpless folk. Why the warning light doesn’t go on for the average american when the congress excludes themselves from something like obamacare or insider trading is beyond me. They even excluded themselves from the federal ban on smoking in government buildings and could smoke in their own offices when first enacted while shouting how they were protecting people! Great point you made joe on how they keep us so busy working to make a decent living that we don’t even have time to deal with them. Just the way they like it!

  3. “But What about Sweden, Finland, and Norway with their Safety Nets and Universal Healthcare?”

    Well, these countries actually vary quite a bit from each other. Citizens of Denmark get taxed very heavily, citizens of Norway about equal to workers in a high-tax US state. (Bit lighter for low earners, 1-2 % heavier above 100 000 $ income). Of course, Norway has a heavy total tax burden, but the taxes on businesses are higher than in the US, with fewer loopholes. Oil industry is especially heavily taxed. Personal income consequently bears less of the weight. And policies aimed at encouraging two-income households and making it easier to combine work and children. So there are a higher percentage of taxpayers to spread the burden over.

    Also, policies are aimed at maximizing the size of the middle class. It is the most efficient taxpaying class. The poorer people don’t have the surplus money, and the richer do not have a proportional economic activity to their wealth. The bigger the middle class, the more money a tax rate produces.

    Also, of course, the USA spends 18 % of GDP on healthcare, and 4,5 % of its military budget. Other countries spend 9 % of GDP on healthcare and 1- 3 % on the military. A health care inefficiency of twice the military budget makes it hard to catch up.

  4. Pingback: Public Schools: Incarcerate and Indoctrinate | Vigilant Vote

  5. Pingback: Public Schools: Incarcerate and Indoctrinate | Joe Jarvis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s